|
Thesis Overview | Background
Information | The Role of International
Law and Norms |
Thesis Outline | Methodologies
to be Employed | Conclusion

THESIS OVERVIEW
The private sector[1]
is involved in the commercial sexual exploitation of
children (CSEC). Whether the exploitation is the result
of commission or omission on its part may be subject
to debate, however the private sector’s connection to
this fundamental violation of children’s rights is undeniable.
Three sub-sectors within the realm of private enterprise
have traditionally been associated with CSEC. The first
sub-sector includes the travel and tourism industries.
Businesses in this category have publicly claimed to
have taken the lead in confronting the problem and developing
innovative strategies to combat the phenomena. A second
sub-sector includes the media industries. These groups
comprise journalists, photographers, television and
film producers, acting and modelling agencies and advertising
firms. Although some positive initiatives have been
noted, there is consensus among child advocacy organizations
that not enough is being done to protect children from
the harms associated with these trades. The third sub-sector
represents the new technologies. This relatively young
set of industries has received a considerable amount
of attention since their involvement was first discussed
at the World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation
in Stockholm in 1996. No doubt the Internet has assisted
advocates in getting their positive message across in
an effective and efficient manner, but it has equally
helped those who violate the rights of children accomplish
their abuse cloaked in complete anonymity.
The proposed thesis will examine each of the three
sub-sectors of the private industry noted above, identifying
the individuals and groups involved and their efforts
in eliminating CSEC or, in some cases, perpetuating
it. Although the obstacles or concerns of each project
will be reviewed, the focus will remain on "best
practices" and "lessons learned". The
emphasis on positive outcomes will hopefully demonstrate
that good work can indeed be accomplished through an
acknowledgement of the problem coupled with a determination
to make a difference in the lives of children.
| Back to Top |
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The five years between the first World Congress against
Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children (Stockholm,
1996) and the Second World Congress (Yokohama, 2001)
have witnessed advancement in the quantity and quality
of initiatives taken by the private sector to undermine
CSEC. In this respect, the travel and tourism industries
have produced a great deal of material and a number
of high profile agreements and resolutions have been
made at the international level. A particularly notable
initiative was the recent adoption by the World Tourism
Organization’s General Assembly of a new Global
Code of Ethics for Tourism. Many travel-related
agencies, at international, regional and national levels,
have also taken measures – such as the promulgation
of codes of conduct, training programs for employees
and campaigns for public education – all aimed at preventing
CSEC.
Achievements have also been reached by media-related
businesses. Journalists have participated in meetings
to draft ethical codes aimed at defining ways in which
CSEC can be discussed and portrayed in effective and
non-exploitative manners. The photography and film
industries have also begun to discuss how they can avoid
contributing to CSEC. Technological developments have
been made allowing the filtering and rating of television
programs to protect children from viewing harmful content
and parallel initiatives have been taken to protect
child actors from the psychological harm of portraying
CSEC. The benefits of television and film industries
for promoting public awareness have been explored, notably
by non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
The unregulated nature and explosive
growth of the Internet has provided child exploiters
the luxury of anonymity, creating different and new
forms of CSEC. Several meetings subsequent to the first
World Congress have examined, specifically, the issue
of on-line exploitation. These international gatherings
have set out a number of guiding principles and suggestions
as to how the Internet can best be controlled and have
examined the responsibilities of private sector Internet
companies. Efforts have also been made in exploring
ways to regulate the Internet and in reinforcing cooperation
between law enforcement officials and members of the
"high-tech" community. Technologies are being
developed to filter and rate content so that individuals
and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) can prevent harmful
material from entering their spheres. Research is currently
being conducted to verify the extent to which ISPs can
be expected to participate in the elimination of child
pornography from the Internet. As discussion continues,
the world grows closer to an understanding of the limits
of this private sector sub-group and the potential for
new forms of technologies to help reduce its ills.
In spite of the commendable efforts outlined above,
a number of barriers exist preventing full implementation
of the private sector’s commitments and obligations.
It is true that management in certain industries (i.e.,
hospitality) have begun to take remedial steps to eliminate
CSEC, but it remains unclear as to how adequately information
on these steps has been disseminated to ground-level
workers. Codes of conduct and "best practice"
guidelines are touted as the most comprehensive and
effective means of achieving these ends. However, as
such codes are non-binding and too new to have adequately
been tested, their ultimate feasibility is yet unknown.
The proposed thesis will canvass the efficacy of the
initiatives that have developed and evolved to combat
CSEC and shall assess their progress toward meeting
the common goal of ending it.
| Back to Top |
THE
ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND NORMS
There have been a number of recent developments at
international law that undertake to strengthen linkages
between corporate responsibility and the protection
of children’s rights and these too will be reviewed
in the proposed thesis. Much of the basis for this
framework is found in the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
Notably, the preamble of this declaration that states,
“Every individual and every organ of society, keeping
this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by
teaching and education to promote respect for these
rights”.
The wide reaching ambit of responsibility outlined
in the UDHR encompasses individual and corporate bodies
as well as States, thus suggesting that private sector
industries are seized with the obligation of such protection.
Furthermore, Article 30 indicates, "Nothing in
this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for
any State, group or person any right to engage in any
activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction
of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein".
Enumerated rights specifically include non-exploitation
and access to education. Although this document is
non-binding, its provisions are implemented through
the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
and the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The Convention
on the Rights of the Child
(CRC) offers the most comprehensive, and the most
widely accepted, protections for children’s rights.
Articles 31 through 37 outline rights to education,
leisure and development and establish prohibitions upon
various forms of abuse, including economic and sexual
exploitation. Another significant development has been
the adoption of the Optional
Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child
on the sale of children, child prostitution and child
pornography. There have also been a number of binding
obligations promulgated by the International Labour
Organization (ILO) which establish standards for employment
conditions, including such issues relevant to children
as minimum age and protections against the worst forms
of child labour (i.e., ILO
Convention 182).
A number of non-binding multilateral declarations have
also been developed to place checks upon the work of
private businesses, in particular those that are multinational
in origin. Many of these declarations include in their
scope States, employers, as well as employees. Perhaps
most importantly, the agreements recognize not only
the need for private industries to respect human rights,
but that their position in society places a strong obligation
to enhance and promote these rights. An example of this
is seen in the ILO’s Tripartite
Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises
and Social Policy. Protections and obligations
are also found in the Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD) Guidelines
for Multinational Enterprises. Further directives,
such as the OECD’s Principles
of Corporate Governance, require businesses to recognize
the context in which they operate and thus contribute
to the greater benefit of society.
The United Nations has recently undertaken an important
new initiative, the "Global
Compact", which requests that businesses show
good "global citizenship" in the nations in
which they operate. The human rights section of the
source document explains that businesses should support
and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed
human rights within their sphere of influence and ensure
they are not complicit to potential violations.
Although the UN compact is voluntary, it turns the
attention of such industries to human rights and represents
an important development in ensuring both respect for,
and promotion of, such rights. This dual objective
has also been noted in other UN fora. A recent progress
report by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
(UNHCHR) listed a series of reasons why respect for
human rights is important for the private sector. Points
noted include, inter alia: Compliance with both
local and international laws; satisfying consumer concerns;
promoting the rule of law; building community goodwill;
keeping markets open; and increasing worker productivity
and retention. Several accountability mechanisms have
also been identified by the UN including Global Stakeholder
Initiatives, which are designed to encompass industries
such as rug-making and Case-Specific Stakeholder Initiatives,
which are created to deal with individual cases of unacceptable
practices, such as resource-exploitation in an identified
region.
Other international norms may be hindering global attempts
to alleviate the foundations underlying CSEC, specifically
in the poorest countries of the world. A threat to
poverty eradication and arguably a complete elimination
of CSEC may be found in Structural Adjustment Programs
(SAPs). Under schemes designed by the International
Monetary Fund and the World Bank, several countries
in the Southern hemisphere (i.e., Asia, Latin America,
Africa) have become burdened by insurmountable debt
and have lost autonomy due to the resulting power imbalance.
Liberalized trade and an emphasis on privatization have
led to drastic cutbacks in government social expenditures,
currency devaluation and loss of employment. The aims
of integrating developing countries into the "world
trading order" has led to an ever-increasing chasm
between wealth and poverty, particularly because Southern
countries are forced to adjust to the standards of the
North. There has been little focus on long-term sustainability
and poverty reduction. Governments are pressured to
respond to creditors prior to the social conditions
of their citizens. Organized criminal groups have thrived
under such conditions. As poverty and inequality have
repeatedly been cited as the leading causes of CSEC,
SAPs may be one major block in eliminating this human
rights violation.
As the above points illustrate, there have been a number
of developments at the international level considering
the role played by the private sector in the protection
of children’s rights. Although many of the resulting
documents are not binding, they do offer important guidelines
of options available to big business in both protecting
and promoting such rights. Clearly, CSEC falls within
the ambit of all of these documents and any involvement
of children in the making or viewing of harmful material
is prohibited by international law or by international
policy guidelines. The interconnection of international
law and norms, private sector responsibilities, and
CSEC will be explored in the proposed thesis.
| Back to Top |
METHODOLOGIES
TO BE EMPLOYED
The methodologies that will be
employed to investigate the themes of the proposed thesis
will include a combination of primary and secondary
research. A cursory literary review has already been
conducted and very little information was located that
studied the topic specifically. The two central pieces
written on commercial sexual exploitation of children
and the role and involvement of the private sector are
a report
drafted in 2000 by Ofelia Calcetas-Santos, the United
Nations’ Special Rapporteur on the sale of children,
child prostitution and child pornography and a theme
paper that the candidate wrote on behalf of ECPAT
International (End Child Prostitution, Pornography and
Trafficking) for the Second World Congress on Commercial
Sexual Exploitation of Children in 2001. Other materials
in the form of books and journal articles with a focus
on corporate responsibility and/or CSEC more generally,
as well as materials that examine the work of one specific
industry toward combating CSEC (i.e., tourism) have
been identified. Case law also exists that touches
on many of the thesis’ topics, much of which has already
been collected and analyzed by the candidate as part
of The Protection Project at Harvard University’s John
F. School of Government[2]. Jurisprudence will also be used as an investigatory
tool for the proposed thesis.
Conference materials from the first and second world
congresses against CSEC will be studied as well. The
candidate participated in the Stockholm conference in
1996 and will be attending the follow-up in 2001. A
great deal of literature is disseminated by NGOs and
inter-governmental agencies at these meetings, the majority
of which is inaccessible elsewhere. During the Second
World Congress the candidate will be conducting interviews
with experts from around the world who have been studying
related issues over the last five years.
Finally, the main "players" in the field
-- including members of the ECPAT
network, project officers at UNICEF,
regional coordinators for the Focal
Point on Sexual Exploitation, and representatives
from the NGO
Group of the Rights of the Child and the International
Bureau for Children’s Rights -- will all be contacted
and visited by the candidate to assemble information
and collect data from the stake holders working within
these institutions. The purpose of the meetings will
be to gather the opinions and experiences of children’s
rights experts who are in communication with the various
constituencies (including private sector partners) on
a regular basis.
| Back to Top |
THESIS
OUTLINE
1.0 Executive Summary
2.0 Introduction
2.1 Private Sector Defined
2.1.1
Organized Crime
2.1.2
Businesses not directly involved in CSEC
2.1.3
The Sex Trade
2.2 International Law
and the Private Sector
2.2.1
Hard Law
2.2.2
Soft Law
3.0 Travel and Tourism Sub-Sector
3.1 The Industries
3.2 Cross-border Initiatives
3.3 Regional and National
Programs and Mechanisms
4.0 The Media Sub-Sector
4.1 The “Players”
4.2 Journalism
4.3 Photography
4.4 Television / Film
4.5 Acting / Modelling
4.6 Advertising
5.0 New Technologies Sub-Sector
5.1 Global Responses
5.2 Filtering and Rating
Systems
5.3
Walled Gardens
5.4
Virtual Zoning
5.5 Internet Service
Providers
5.6 Future of the Internet
Revolution
6.0 Lessons Learned
6.1 Themes and Outcomes
6.2
International Cooperation
6.3
Trade Unions and Professional Associations
6.4
Analysis and Discussion
7.0 Conclusion
7.1
Emerging Issues
7.2 A
World without CSEC?
| Back to Top |
CONCLUSION
Although much attention has been
paid in recent years to the responsibility of governments
and the work of child welfare agencies in efforts to
eliminate CSEC, little has been said about the private
sector. Yet, multinational corporations, small businesses,
and even individual employers and employees play a pivotal
role in this most fundamental human rights violation.
The five years between the first and second world congresses
have witnessed many private sector advancements in helping
to eliminate CSEC and have seen greater commitments
for future change. The proposed thesis will identify
and analyze the achievements, the set backs, the obstacles
to full and proper execution of the commitments made
by the sub-sectors, and the arguments that have been
advanced to justify the actions and inactions in each
case.

[1] For the purpose of the thesis, the private sector
will be primarily defined as for-profit industries.
Although many of the principles are relevant for other
members of the private sector, including civil society
organizations and non-profit agencies (whose efforts
are no doubt instrumental in protecting children from
CSEC), the motivations for participation differ
greatly when profit incentives are involved.
|